The YouTube video „The crisis of Credit Visualised” explains the effects as well as the reasons for the .com bust. Before the collapse, lenders lend money to reliable families who wanted to buy houses. The resulting mortgage was then sold to investment bankers. Investment bankers sold the safest mortgages to investors. However, the supply of reliable individuals who needed houses soon came to a halt. Therefore, the lenders gave money to people without checking their income and without any down payment. Since many house owners were unreliable and could never had afforded such houses, they soon defaulted. As too many defaulted, the value of houses dropped. House owners, who had previously been reliable, decided to default as well, because they did not want to pay a mortgage that was much higher than the actual value of the house. Instead of receiving monthly payments, the investment bankers received worthless houses. Brokers were not able to sell any property, lenders stopped lending money, investment bankers did not buy any further mortgages and investors stopped investing. All of them had previously borrowed millions of dollars in order to invest their money safely. However, with the .com bust the entire financial system froze.
What I could have done better:
- the video was not about the .com bust but about the 2008 financial crisis --> misunderstanding
- write in Paragraphs
- include CDO/ CDS, 9/11 and 1%
- use a more formal English
The video “The
Crisis of Credit Visualized” by Jonathan Jarvis explains the effects as well as
the reasons for the 2008 financial crisis.
Before the collapse, reliable families used loans in order to afford buying houses. The resulting mortgage was then sold to investment bankers. The mortgages were turned into CDOs, dividing and rating the mortgages according to investment safety.
After the attacks of September 11, as the Federal Reserve Bank lowered the interest rates to 1%, investors diverted their investment from the bank into the safest layer of the CDO. However, the supply of reliable individuals decreased, causing lenders to provide money without income check and down payment. This led to the default of unreliable house owners and therefore to the devaluation of houses. Reliable house owners defaulted as well, because of the difference in value between houses and mortgages.
According
to the credit default swap (CDS), investment bankers receive the houses in case
of default. Therefore, instead of monthly payment they received worthless
houses. Lenders, investment bankers, and
investors stopped investing. All of them had previously borrowed millions of
dollars in order to invest their money safely. However, with the 2008 financial
crisis the entire financial system froze.
Conclusion
To be honest, I'm not really sure whether this version is much better than the version before. Since I had no experience writing summaries, this was kind of a challenge. For example, I wasn't sure whether I should mention the term "CDO" or whether I should describe it in another way.
However, by trying to write it again and by reading one of my friends summaries, I clearly saw the difference between my more or less informal first version and the more formal way I should have written it. In my correction, I tried using a more nominal style (I googled scientific/ more formal English and most of the websites listed the nominal style as one of the main features). This also allowed me to include more information, since the sentences got shorter. I will try keeping this in mind for my next summary.
However, by trying to write it again and by reading one of my friends summaries, I clearly saw the difference between my more or less informal first version and the more formal way I should have written it. In my correction, I tried using a more nominal style (I googled scientific/ more formal English and most of the websites listed the nominal style as one of the main features). This also allowed me to include more information, since the sentences got shorter. I will try keeping this in mind for my next summary.